Brexit: Liam Fox claims UK could accept chlorinated chicken in US trade deal without lowering food standards
‘There’s been no argument about food safety on chlorine-washed chicken – it’s been an argument about animal welfare’
The international trade secretary vowed to protect food quality after withdrawal from the EU – but insisted the controversy about washing poultry in chlorine was purely an “animal welfare” issue.
“There’s been no argument about food safety on chlorine-washed chicken – it’s been an argument about animal welfare,” he told an event.
“So, it’s not been about food standards per se, so that’s a slightly different debate and much more difficult to quantify because the legal definitions about it at the WTO are much less.”
The comments came as Mr Fox said MPs voting down the withdrawal agreement bill would be setting the UK on a path to either “revocation of Article 50 or leaving without a deal”.
He was accused immediately of a “chilling disregard” for food standards in the search for a “quick-and-dirty trade deal with Donald Trump’s America”, by anti-Brexit groups.
The stance was also condemned by the consumer group Which? on the grounds that Mr Fox was simply incorrect to claim it was purely an animal welfare controversy.
“Liam Fox is wrong to suggest chlorinated chicken is not a food safety and standards issue,” said Caroline Normand, its director of advocacy.
“One of the reasons why foodborne disease rates are so much higher in the US is that these measures are often used as a desperate attempt to make up for widespread safety problems in food production – leaving bacteria like salmonella to run rampant.”
Mr Gove told a House of Lords inquiry said: “This is something on which all members of the government are agreed.
“We are not going to dilute our high food-safety standards or our high environmental standards in pursuit of any trade deal.”
“He’s made it very clear that, if he gets his way on Brexit, he’ll be pushing for the UK to adopt US food standards,” said Gareth Thomas MP, a Labour supporter of the People’s Vote campaign.
“That means chlorine-washed chicken, hormone-injected beef, milk from infected cow udders and numerous other examples.”
And Virendra Sharma, a Labour backer of the Best for Britain group, said: “Fox’s chilling disregard for consumer protections is beyond a disgrace.
“There is no doubt that a US-UK trade deal would compromise food standards in Britain. This would be a disaster for our country, shredding animal welfare and consumer protections that keep us safe.”
“I think MPs will need to look and see whether they want to continue down a path that inexorably, I think, takes us to revocation of Article 50 or leaving without a deal,” he told the Institute for Government think-tank.
MPs should “ask whether that is the best course, democratically or economically, for the UK”, Mr Fox said, adding: “MPs will have to face that decision.”
The international trade secretary’s comments on chlorine-washed chicken follow the publication of Washington’s “negotiating objectives” suggesting Britain will not enjoy softer treatment than any other US ally.
Critics pointed out the blueprint would:
* Remove barriers on “sanitary and physiosanitary” standards in the farm industry – a demand to sell chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-pumped beef, they said.
* “Provide full market access for US products” – potentially ending NHS controls on medicine costs in favour of US-style direct-marketing of drugs.
* “Ensure that the UK does not impose measures that restrict cross-border data flows” – ending current restrictions the UK imposes as a member of the European Economic Area (EEA).
In a statement, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) stressed its commitment to food standards – but stopped short of repeating Mr Gove’s “no” to chlorine-washed chicken.
“The secretary of state has been clear on numerous occasions that we do not intend to compromise on our high food standards in pursuit of any trade deals,” a spokesperson said.
“And we will use all the tools at our disposal to make sure standards are protected and British farmers are not left at a competitive disadvantage.”
The statement added: “We will only accept imports that meet the standards we currently maintain on behalf of British consumers.”
Mr Fox tried to calm the fears about US food imports, saying: “I have said until I am blue in face that we will not reduce our standards as we move forward.”
He said 59 per cent of Chinese consumers, and 60 per cent in India, had indicated a willingness to pay more for UK products, which were “regarded as a sign of quality”.
“It would be self-defeating to see us reduce our standards, there’s no advantage from a trading perspective,” Mr Fox said – before arguing chlorine-washed chicken was a separate, animal welfare issue.