Education Letter: The real problem with RAE

Opinions on girls and science, literacy and numeracy tests, Chris Woodhead, the role of research, and falling academic standards

Keith Flett
Thursday 11 February 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

AS AN historian I am a firm believer in research - an engagement with original sources - wherever possible. However there is research and research. The Research Assessment Exercise is not really about stimulating worthwhile research, it is simply a crude attempt at a productivity measurement.

What Lucy Hodges' article on the RAE (Education, 28 January) rather skates over is the adverse impact it is having on genuine research. As the organiser of a regular socialist history seminar at the Institute of Historical Research in London I aim, of course, for maximum academic rigour. At the same time, I also want to encourage non-professional academics to participate since, particularly in the field of labour history, they have an enormous amount to contribute from their own experiences and researches.

I find myself in a constant struggle to retain the integrity of such a seminar against the demand that papers given must always be able to be refereed and published as soon as possible. I am very much in favour of publication, and no slouch at it myself. I am also willing to allow that those who rarely or never publish may also have an enormous amount of interest to contribute.

KEITH FLETT

Convenor,

London Socialist Historians Group

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in