15 years since the Moneymaker effect, poker’s journey from art to science is at a crossroads
In the Bahamas, Lawrence Ostlere talks to the big-money poker winners including the legendary Daniel Negreanu and British pro Liv Boeree, who are constantly evolving their game as the competition gets smarter
It is 1.30am in a packed Binion’s Horseshoe casino in Las Vegas, and the 2003 poker world championship has boiled down from 389 players to two: Sammy Farha, a seasoned pro wearing a sharp suit and gaping shirt to reveal a chain necklace and chest hair; and the aptly named Chris Moneymaker, a plump accountant from Georgia who qualified online for $86.
Piled high between them is the first-place prize of $2.34m.
“Don’t do it,” jokes Farha as Moneymaker reaches to make a raise at the start of the next hand. It continues innocuously enough until the turn card falls and Moneymaker makes a bold re-raise. Farha calls and suddenly the pot has swollen. The last card lands and Moneymaker misses completely. With the best hand, Farha checks. “I’m all in,” announces Moneymaker, and a noise ripples around the room. Farha thinks it might be a bluff, and says so, but he can’t bring himself to make the monumental call and folds, handing the rookie a huge chip lead.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies