Teenagers who vandalised black schoolhouse with swastikas sentenced to read fiction on history's horrors

'I had no idea about how in depth the darkest parts of human history go'

The titles recommended concern a variety of subjects including the Holocaust, racism and persecution (Shutterstock)

A US judge handed down an unusual sentence last year after five teenagers defaced a historic black schoolhouse with swastikas and the words “white power” and “black power”.

Instead of spending time in community service, Virginia judge Avelina Jacob decided the youths should read a book.

But not just any book. They had to choose from a list covering some of history’s most divisive and tragic periods.

The horrors of the Holocaust awaited them in Night by Elie Wiesel. The racism of the Jim Crow South was there in Maya Angelou’s I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. The brutal hysteria of persecution could be explored in The Crucible by Arthur Miller.

A year has passed since the youths spray painted their hateful messages on the side of the Ashburn Colored School, a 19th century classroom that had been used by black children during segregation in Northern Virginia. The swastikas and words were long ago covered with paint. The teenagers have read their books and written their reports.

The charges, destruction of private property and unlawful entry, were dismissed in January, Alejandra Rueda, a deputy commonwealth attorney who suggested the reading sentence, said.

“I hope that they learned the lesson that I hoped that they would learn, which was tolerance,” Ms Rueda said.

So, did they?

The juveniles who vandalised the old schoolhouse in Ashburn, a community of about 43,000 people northwest of Washington DC., could not be identified because of their ages. But the commonwealth attorney’s office has said they were public school students ages 16 and 17. Two were white, and three were non-white.

One of the teenagers agreed for this article to share the list of books that he chose. Among them were The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini, set in Afghanistan; To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee; The Tortilla Curtain by TC Boyle, about a Mexican couple trying to make a life in California and Things Fall Apart, a tale of Nigeria by Chinua Achebe.

He wrote that two books affected him deeply: 12 Years a Slave, a memoir by Solomon Northup, a free black man who was kidnapped in 1841 and sold into slavery in Louisiana, and Night.

An excerpt from one of his court-ordered essays was provided to The New York Times, with his permission, by his defence lawyer. He describes not fully knowing what a swastika meant and that he thought it “didn’t really mean much”.

“Not anymore,” he wrote. “I was wrong, it means a lot to people who were affected by them. It reminds them of the worst things, losing family members and friends. Of the pain of torture, psychological and physical. Among that it reminds them how hateful people can be and how the world can be cruel and unfair.”

Now, he wrote, he sees the swastika as a symbol of “oppression” and “white power, that their race is above all else, which is not the case”.

He also wrote that while he had studied this period in history class, the lesson lasted only a few days.

“I had no idea about how in depth the darkest parts of human history go,” he wrote.

He wrote that he feels “especially awful” that he made anyone feel bad.

“Everybody should be treated with equality, no matter the race, religion, sex or orientation,” he wrote in his essay. “I will do my best to see to it that I never am this ignorant again.”

Since the Ashburn case, the reading sentence has been applied to another case, one involving a 14-year-old who threatened a black student with a noose, Ms Rueda said.

She gathered a list of 36 books with input from librarians who emphasised that the most enlightening could be A Wreath for Emmett Till, a poetry book about a black youth of the same age who was murdered in Mississippi in 1955.

Marilyn Nelson, the author, said she was concerned it might have the opposite effect to what was intended. “I can’t say I’m pleased to know that my work is being inflicted as a punishment,” she said. “Will kids punished by being made to read poetry ever read poetry again?”

Other authors expressed hope that the underlying message in their works was not lost.

Boyle, whose The Tortilla Curtain is told from four points of view, said he hoped the teenager “will be able to live inside the skin of someone unfamiliar to him, whether that be the Mexican immigrant couple or the Anglo couple living in a gated community and that the experience will enrich his social perspective.”

After the graffiti episode in September 2016, the Ashburn schoolhouse underwent a renovation organised by students from the Loudoun School for the Gifted, a private high school that owns it. Money was raised, work teams were drawn from community volunteers and the little schoolhouse eventually opened as a museum.

Some criticised the sentence. For example, an English teacher at the nearby Loudoun school balked at the idea of associating reading with punishment, said Deep Sran, the school’s founder.

Kamran Fareedi, 17, a pupil at Loudoun had been working on the renovation before the vandalism. He said he thought the sentence “reeks of pampering and no consequences.”

“When I heard that the punishment was that they were going to have to do homework assignments, I was very disappointed,” he said. “All over the country we have a giant mass incarceration problem. And particularly African-Americans do the slightest thing, their interaction with the criminal justice system is way more harsh. When people of colour make mistakes they don’t get the chance to start over.”

Shailee Sran, a 16-year-old student at the school, said she hoped that the teenager learned the value of bravery in defending what is right from his reading of To Kill a Mockingbird.

“I actually thought the punishment made sense,” she said. “I feel like if they don’t understand what they did wrong it is not helping the problem. It is just teaching them not to get caught.”

© New York Times