French state thwarts £400m Go-Ahead bid
The French consortium bidding for Go-Ahead last night threw in the towel after the French government warned it not to table a higher hostile offer valuing the rail and bus operator at 800p-a-share or £400m.
The French consortium bidding for Go-Ahead last night threw in the towel after the French government warned it not to table a higher hostile offer valuing the rail and bus operator at 800p-a-share or £400m.
The intervention means that the existing bid from C3D, a joint venture between the state-controlled Caisse des Depots-Developpement and Rhone Capital, is now certain to fail. The current bid is worth 650p.
The French government's move is understood to have come after the state-owned French railway SNCF, which is already Go-Ahead's partner on the Thameslink rail franchise, objected to C3D making an increased offer.
C3D and its financial advisers approached Go-Ahead on Monday night seeking a board recommendation for an offer at 800p but were turned down. Attempts continued until yesterday evening to persuade Go-Ahead to recommend an offer, but these failed.
Sources in the C3D camp said that but for the political objections, it would have gone ahead and made a higher offer to shareholders over the heads of the Go-Ahead board. This could have forced SNFC to intervene with a bid in excess of 800p.
In a statement issued last night after the close of the market, C3D said it would not increase its offer in the absence of a recommendation and said its 650p offer would remain open until 25 October. As of Tuesday night, the offer had 0.13 per cent acceptances.
Go-Ahead shares are likely to fall sharply when the market opens this morning. Last night they closed 7.5p higher at 737.5p.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies