Letter: Sins of the flesh
Sins of the flesh
Sir: I believe Jack Vettriano is wrong in claiming that it is the subject matter of his paintings - sex - which causes critics to disregard his work (Review front, 23 July). Rather it is simply that he has committed the ultimate sin of 20th-century artistic pursuit, the sin of success.
The public enjoys Vettriano's work for the very same reason that critics and intellectuals like Duncan Macmillan revile it: because it is accessible. His work needs no interpretation, no intellectualisation; its meaning is there on the canvas for all to see and understand.
Naturally I am not making any great claims for Vettriano. Certainly he is not a van Gogh or a Picasso. He is simply, as he admits himself, good at applying paint to canvas and at creating a striking image which stirs the imagination of the viewer.
However, the point that the self-appointed guardians of artistic integrity should be forced to concede is that his art has an audience, a very large audience who are entertained and affected by it, and as such it has to be accepted as a valid and important part of our artistic history.
ALAN SHARP
Brussels
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies