Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Alexander Litvinenko case: Coroner will not consider Russian involvement in his death

 

Heather Saul
Thursday 19 December 2013 17:33 GMT
Comments
Alexander Litvinenko is pictured at the Intensive Care Unit of University College Hospital in 2006 - secret services allegedly asked the late spy to provide 'expert analysis' on a confidential Foreign Office report
Alexander Litvinenko is pictured at the Intensive Care Unit of University College Hospital in 2006 - secret services allegedly asked the late spy to provide 'expert analysis' on a confidential Foreign Office report

The British coroner examining the death of an ex-KGB officer Alexander Litvinenko has today ruled the question of whether Russia was responsible will be withdrawn from the scope of the inquiry.

Coroner Robert Owen also said he will not examine whether Britain was aware of any threats to Litvinenko's life, and failed to take reasonable measures to ensure his protection before he died after drinking tea laced with the radioactive isotope polonium-210.

He said that because all the evidence available can't be considered, any conclusion would be incomplete.

Mr Owen made the announcement following a successful legal bid by the UK government to keep documents under wraps that could prove relevant in explaining the events surrounding the death of the officer-turned-dissident who was a critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“This is an issue of the highest importance, involving as it does the possible culpability of the British state for the death of Alexander Litvinenko,” Mr Owen wrote. “If any investigation of this issue is to be embarked upon, it must be an investigation which can properly and thoroughly examine the issue, so that a conclusion soundly based on reliable factual evidence can be arrived at.”

Britain has accused two Russians of the 2006 killing. However, Moscow has refused to extradite them.

The government has ruled out a public inquiry into the ex-officer's death, with Home Secretary Theresa May citing the potential financial costs for this decision among other reasons, saying it was “true that international relations have been a factor in the government's decision-making.”

“An inquest managed and run by an independent coroner is more readily explainable to some of our foreign partners, and the integrity of the process more readily grasped, than an inquiry, established by the Government, under a chairman appointed by the Government, which has the power to see Government material potentially relevant to their interests, in secret.

“However this has not been a decisive factor and it if had stood alone would not have led the Government to refuse an inquiry.”

Litvinenko's widow, Marina, had accused Britain of putting relations with Russia ahead of uncovering the truth. In October she appealed for financial help from the British public to find the "truth" surrounding his death seven years ago.

Additional reporting by PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in