Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inbox
Get our free View from Westminster email
A claim that using recycled cooking oil to fuel aeroplanes can help solve the climate emergency has landed Andrea Leadsom in hot water.
Friends of the Earth has sharply criticised the business secretary after she hailed the move as a step towards the UK achieving its target of ‘net zero’ carbon emissions by 2050.
“Biofuels are not the magic solution to the climate emergency,” said Mike Childs, Friends of the Earth’s head of policy.
“The international dash to expand the use of bioenergy and biofuels has had significant impacts: displacing food production, harming biodiversity and seizing indigenous peoples’ land.
“If ministers really want to address aviation’s contribution to the climate crisis they must take steps to cut flights – particularly for frequent flyers – and abandon plans to expand Heathrow and other airports.”
The row blew up after Ms Leadsom hailed a “head-start” by Airbus in what she dubbed “a new decade of decarbonisation”.
“Last month, they celebrated the first flight of one of their ‘Beluga’ Super Transporters with sustainable aviation fuel,” she told an event in London.
“An aircraft over 50-feet high and nearly 200-feet long being powered – in part – by recycled cooking oil!
Climate change: Decade's defining issue in pictures
Show all 20
“In 2018, sustainable fuels covered just 0.1 per cent of the industry’s needs. So there’s a massive opportunity to grow this – greening existing power sources as we develop new ones.”
In a tweet on the Airbus move, Ms Leadsom added: “UK will do everything possible to tackle global climate change.”
It means the plans – which will require huge and potentially unpopular changes to transport, energy and agriculture – will only emerge more than a year after the legal commitment was made.
The climate crisis was barely mentioned by Boris Johnson during the election campaign and he boycotted the Channel 4 debate on the issue – when he was replaced by a melting ice sculpture.
A spokesperson for the department for business, energy and industrial strategy (BEIS) said: “The secretary of state has always been clear that a range of solutions will be required to eliminate our contribution to climate change by 2050.
“Biofuels, when sourced correctly and sustainably, are an important part of this mix - but cannot be a replacement for renewables, carbon capture, and energy efficiency.”
The 2050 commitment is described as “net zero” because air travel and farming are viewed as unavoidable, but carbon from those activities would be taken out of the air by growing trees or burying carbon dioxide.
However, the independent committee on climate change warned that burning aviation biofuel without capturing the carbon could result in higher emissions than simply burning fossil fuels.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies