It's official – Seinfield has been right about 'double-dippers' all along

Study puts to bed debate started more than 20 years ago on Seinfeld episode

Kate Nelson
Sunday 07 August 2016 17:35 BST
Comments
The amount of germs spread by double dipping depends how thick your dip is
The amount of germs spread by double dipping depends how thick your dip is

Have you ever absent-mindedly dunked your cracker into a dip having already done so once?

If so, you are committing the most heinous of dinner party crimes by spreading abundance of germs.

So-called double dipping sees a surge in bacteria, according to research in Harvard’s Healthbeat journal.

It puts to bed a debate started after a 1993 episode of Seinfeld in which George Costanza is called out on the offence at a wake.

After double-dipping a cracker, a disgusted fellow mourner objects: “That’s like putting your whole mouth right in the dip.”

Dr Robert Shmerling, editor of Healthbeat, said: “This research does raise the possibility that a person who is sick might spread a disease by re-dipping a chip.”

Pneumonic plague, TB and Legionnaires’ disease all spread via saliva.

The study investigated the effects of repeatedly dunking a crisp in various substances.

It found that the number of the bacteria varies depending on the type of dip – with salsa accumulating more germs than chocolate or cheese.

Because salsa is not as thick as chocolate or cheese, more of the dip touching the bitten cracker falls back into the communal container taking the dipper’s bacteria-riddled saliva with it.

The solution? Scientific advice says if you must double-dip you should at least turn your crisp or cracker around.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in