Why should MPs get an inflation-busting pay rise?
They will now earn more than twice as much as the average worker, writes John Rentoul
MPs are to receive a rise in pay to £82,000 a year, it was confirmed yesterday – 2.7 times as much as the median full-time worker on £30,000. What are the arguments for and against such largesse?
First, the case for the defence. MPs are entitled to point out that they no longer set their own pay. Since 2010, in the wake of the expenses scandal, it has been decided by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority. Indeed, it could be argued that pay was kept low for decades because the House of Commons was so embarrassed about voting for its own salaries.
This year’s 3.1 per cent rise – compared with inflation, which is currently running at 1.8 per cent – was intended to keep MPs’ pay in line with the average in the public sector.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies